May 04, 2004

Magnificent, but not Waugh

Having just read Vile Bodies for the first time and in the middle of a bit of pre-teaching prep on Waugh, I came across this 1954 Atlantic Monthly review of the writer by Charles Rolo. At one point, Rolo suggests that:

This core of tragic awareness gives to Waugh's comic vision the dimension of serious art. The paradox, in fact, is that when Waugh is being comic, he makes luminous the failures of his age, confronts us vividly with the desolating realities; and when he is being serious, he is liable to become trashy. For without the restraints of the ironic stance, his critical viewpoint reveals itself as bigoted and rancorous; his snobbery emerges as obsessive and disgusting; and his archaism involves him in all kinds of silliness.

Hmm. That might be case with Brideshead Revisited (which I confess I've never read in full), but is it fair of the subtler Sword of Honour trilogy (only the first volume of which had been published at the time of the review)?

Posted by Alan Allport at May 4, 2004 12:05 AM
Comments

Don't know if this helps, but one of my few memories from reading *Scoop* years ago is of jolting changes in mood and perspective when the story moved from the comic to the serious. Maybe the reviewer had in mind something like that?

On the other hand, inconsistent levels of realism in fiction are a personal bugbear of mine lately so maybe I'm projecting that onto what you're saying.

Posted by: Martha Bridegam at May 4, 2004 12:12 PM

Don't know if this helps, but one of my few memories from reading *Scoop* years ago is of jolting changes in mood and perspective when the story moved from the comic to the serious. Maybe the reviewer had in mind something like that?

Have you ever read Vile Bodies? It's worth it - it's short and funny, and worth the modest investment in time. But there is a noticeable darkening of the mood half way through, which according to Waugh's biographers is attributable to his discovery that he was being cuckolded (his first wife, confusingly enough, was also called Evelyn).

Posted by: Alan Allport at May 4, 2004 12:27 PM

See my review at my blog of Stephen Fry's film version. Hey you print it here at Horizon!! Brideshead is overheated as Martha would say, in its American edition--they have never published Waugh's 1959 revision, which is now the only one available in England. He got grouchy as his liver swelled.

Posted by: ROBBIE at May 6, 2004 04:05 PM

Brideshead is overheated in its American edition--they have never published Waugh's 1959 revision, which is now the only one available in England.

What are the differences between the two?

Posted by: Alan Allport at May 6, 2004 04:38 PM

Waugh rhapsodizes big time. In his introduction to the revised version, he called the unrevised 1945 novel, 'a panygeric preached over an empty coffin' and 'with a full stomach' found his more indulgent patches 'distasteful'. His American publishers were having none of it, so if you bought Brideshead there, you will have his uncensored version. I guess which one prefers is mood; I generally prefer the revised and I suspect you have an austere protestant taste, like Maratha, you would prefer the revised version.

Posted by: ROBBIE at May 7, 2004 03:46 AM

Waugh made some odd comments in his prefaces. At the beginning of Officers and Gentlemen he announced that the original three-book vision he had had for the project was being scrapped because, having written the second volume, he now believed that the story was finished; even though every reader could see plainly enough that the plot had loose ends everywhere and was in no sensible way complete.

Posted by: Alan Allport at May 7, 2004 05:56 AM

Yeah I think he was having barmy patches by then, as Pinfold clearly shows. Do you think Trimmer is a cypher for his escalating snobbery/class hostility, carrying on from where he left off with Hooper? By the way, I proposed alt.books.waugh-powell and got a load of pedantry at alt.config; my idea for it was discuss Waugh and all the major English novelists of that period.

Posted by: ROBBIE at May 8, 2004 04:46 AM

Why don't you write something about Powell here? I'd be interested, as his books on my eventual 'to do' list.

Posted by: Alan Allport at May 8, 2004 07:03 AM

I will do just as soon as I get through 'Dance'. Anthony Powell's curry recipe, however, is here:

http://www.anthonypowell.org.uk/ap/apcurry.htm

I will say Alan, that if you haven't read his memoirs then you should, not least for his interesting war and pithy comments and meditations on his trade.

Posted by: ROBBIE at May 9, 2004 08:12 AM