October 01, 2004

Big Important Fads

Just saw the dark teen comedy Heathers again for the first time in, like, a decade.

For those who haven't seen it, Heathers is about a high school couple who kill off students who bother them. To cover their tracks they invent elaborate backstories for their prey which lead, inevitably, to said prey's unfortunate suicide.

In hindsight the most interesting element of the film is how, by taking their lives, the two teenagers are somehow magically given the opportunity to write a new (secret) life for their victims that transforms them retroactively in death and in the eyes of the other students. In one case they stage the double-suicide of two football jocks and contrive for the police to find them naked with a bottle of mineral water (realizing that, ironically, everyone will think they were gay on account of the mineral water--this is the 80's, remember). Later, at the funeral, the two "gay lovers" in matching caskets with football helmets on, one of the fathers screams pathetically, "I love my dead gay son!"

But Heathers is not as funny as it used to be and I was surprised when I realized why.

When the movie was made the big hot-button Issue of the Day was, of course, Teen Suicide. It was all over the news, every fresh suicide reported with a grim and proper but also unintentionally morbid air. Teenagers at the time were submitted to a pervasive propaganda blitz designed to "raise consciousness" of the issue. Several pop songs pretended to address the problem, including the outrageously idiotic "Teen Suicide: Don't Do It" which I feel confident in asserting never helped anyone.

It was mass hysteria. Teens were offing themselves left and right, they said. One almost had the feeling that we were on the verge of a new society bereft of teenagers altogether. Statistics were cooked up, support groups formed, teachers trained, and a new social disease was born. Like all social diseases it was So Serious that no one could be suffered to question it; so serious that it merited only the most quiet, most respectful, most concerned tones. It was a good time for platitudes and sham solemnity. It gave everyone's life that little extra gravity which we all appreciate now and again, gave us something to be serious about. Any questioning of the idea or use of less than a reverent tone would immediately spark indignation, or course, this being interpreted as showing insufficient concern for the dead and suffering.

Everyone knew it, no one had to say it, that this epidemic was merely a symptom of our sick society. No one was quite sure what this sickness was, but no one could doubt it was there, and of course it would be the teenagers, those most vulnerable of people, who would be our canaries. The cult of the martyr-teen was born.

Yes, these were heady times to be a teenager. Now that I'm reminded of it, it all seems so strange, like the memory of a dream, triggered by some random smell or shade of blue. I readily forgot that I'd ever experienced it until I saw this movie again.

But, really, this happens all the time, doesn't it? At what point, in the past two or three decades (or five, or six), has American culture not been gripped by some overblown fear, some obsessive fixation, some grand theme, some fear of itself, of some inner corruption that will bring us all to ruin? We certainly are not free of it now.

Posted by Alan Hogue at October 1, 2004 03:24 PM
Comments

Very interesting. I posted it on my site as well as some of my readers are along these lines of thought.

I don't see how to 'trackback' it though, let me know if you want it done that way. Thanks for the thoughts! (and the link)

-d
sugarandsplice

Posted by: daniel at October 1, 2004 11:05 PM

In 1985, I made a spoof Western at school, and when it came to do the credits, we made up names for all the characters not specifically named on screen - and for some reason we thought 'The Paedophile Kid' sounded vaguely amusing in an ironically self-contradictory kind of way (yes, I know, but we were only about seventeen), so in it went.

I would never do that today: I don't know about the US, but in my native Britain hysteria about paedophilia has reached such an insane pitch (brilliantly satirised by Chris Morris in his 2001 Brass Eye special) that the term is far too loaded to make light of, at least not without adding copious and hugely inappropriate footnotes.

The school in question asked me for a copy for their archive (there's a lot of footage of its buildings prior to major structural changes), and I was very hesitant indeed, purely because of that one word - which unfortunately was impossible to remove without creating a hugely obtrusive jump-cut (the credits were in the form of a wobbly pan across 'WANTED' posters).

Posted by: Michael at October 2, 2004 02:11 PM

Daniel, you can link directly to the posting with the URL http://horizon.bloghouse.net/archives/000233.html

Posted by: Alan Allport at October 2, 2004 02:29 PM

Daniel, glad you liked it. As Alan points out you would boost our totally pointless blog rating if you linked directly to the post, as well. Or would you? I get so confused sometimes. I should look into adding a trackback link to our template someday.

Posted by: Alan Hogue at October 3, 2004 10:08 AM

done!

Posted by: daniel at October 3, 2004 04:48 PM

Over here some of that hysteria seems to have died down with the wilting of the neo-Freudian "Recovered Memory" movement, which we have to thank for all those allegations of ritual satanic child abuse in the 80s. I wonder how that played (or is playing) itself out in the UK?

Posted by: Alan Hogue at October 3, 2004 10:42 PM