...cause Generative Anthropology is gunning for you.
Revealed: mimetic crises!
Employed: new, completely duplicative terminology!
Discovered: the Origin of Language! (We know you've been wondering.)
Another example of intellectuals' preference for studying language rather than, well, what they are ostensively supposed to be studying?
Any better than Deconstruction? All texts are not considered phallic anymore, I guess that's some kind of step forward.
As far as I'm concerned, if they don't start finding things like Parasitic Culture Gaps, then anyone practicing Generative Anthropology will be definitively exposed as a poseur.
Posted by Alan Hogue at December 7, 2004 09:43 AM"Ossa Ips!" -- innit?
Not really a surprise. People go into anthropology with the idea of respect for cultures other than their own; they get tied up in knots over the basic arrogance of observing and reporting on people unlike themselves; they don't want to catch tropical diseases anyway; so what better than to take refuge in desk-bound opacity and creation myths, especially if it's possible to jam Freud and the Book of Genesis together into a single idea and take credit for the result?
Or am I missing something profound here?
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at December 7, 2004 11:43 AMFreud and the Book of Genesis
Which are equally scientific, rational, and theoretically valid.
Or am I missing something profound here?
It's a safe bet that you aren't. I find this sort of thing rather disgusting. It makes me want to drop out of the college application process and become a grocery clerk.
Was reading Marc Bloch last night and came across a nice quote, something to the effect of: When we have managed to convince people that the validity of a science (by which he meant history) lies in making refutation easy, a great victory will have been struck for rationality. That's a relatively close paraphrase. And this opaque and totally unnecessary language so popular in the continental style is nothing more than a cowardly attempt to make refutation by the uninitiated nigh impossible. If someone actually takes the time to do it, you can claim that they misread you.
Posted by: Alan Hogue at December 7, 2004 12:10 PM