Since this story got a lot of Netplay (and rightly so), I think it's only fair to follow it to its conclusion - for now, anyway. Perhaps a rhetorical pat on the back is in order for those church members who have clearly 'encouraged' Reverend Chandler to spend more time with his family?
Posted by Alan Allport at May 12, 2005 04:07 AMIs this a sign that the fourth Great Awakening is waning or still rising?
I don't know how the Baptists operate, but I grew up with a strong dose of American Presbyterianism, and in those churches the pastor is not in charge.
Posted by: Bobby Farouk at May 12, 2005 05:42 AMHmm, considering the have-you-no-sense-of-decency huffing and puffing that came out when this story first aired, I would have thought critics would have been been pleased to see this at least provisional happy ending, and would have been queuing up to congratulate the remaining East Waynesville congregation.
Posted by: Alan Allport at May 12, 2005 10:59 AMThe Technorati results for "Waynesville" point to a number of weblogs that have noted the resignation. Not necessarily politely, but they've noted it.
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at May 12, 2005 01:05 PMHe doesn't look 33.
Posted by: Airbrushed by the Commissars at May 12, 2005 01:09 PMThe Technorati results for "Waynesville" point to a number of weblogs that have noted the resignation. Not necessarily politely, but they've noted it.
Yes, the disappointment is palpable.
Posted by: Alan Allport at May 12, 2005 01:14 PMOrcinus is, as usual, more politically worried than I am (yes, it's possible), but FWIW his take on the East Waynesville episode is that it's a symptom of a continuing bad pattern.
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at May 12, 2005 01:30 PMOrcinus is, as usual, more politically worried than I am (yes, it's possible), but FWIW his take on the East Waynesville episode is that it's a symptom of a continuing bad pattern.
You mean that the revolt of the congregation is a symptom of a continuing bad pattern? Oh, but he's working from yesterday's script, isn't he.
(FWIW I think the pastor's behavior was grotesque and anything other than his ejection from the pulpit an unconscionable error. But the studied non-reaction to his departure by the pious frauds who couldn't shut up a few days ago but are transparently devastated that a bunch of good-ol'-boy Red Staters didn't perform according to type is almost as bad.
And in this case 'politically worried' can only mean, I assume, tediously hysterical).
Posted by: Alan Allport at May 12, 2005 01:40 PMFWIW I think the pastor's behavior was grotesque and anything other than his ejection from the pulpit an unconscionable error.
He was ejected from this particular pulpit; I assume that's what you mean. The article notes that the overall baptist organization has already offered to find him another one.
Posted by: Alan Hogue at May 12, 2005 02:00 PMHe was ejected from this particular pulpit; I assume that's what you mean. The article notes that the overall baptist organization has already offered to find him another one.
Yes, and I am happy for you to make the clarification. The people I am praising are the ordinary parishioners of East Waynesville, not the Baptist organization of which they are a small part, although my understanding is that the national body has a hands-off attitude when it comes to local affairs. I am sure that Reverend Chandler will be able to find himself some obscure niche amongst his reduced flock of dittoheads. The really important point about this story as I see it is that someone tried to turn a regular neighborhood church into a politicized arena and he didn't get away with it. That's a considerable achievement and a good sign and I think it deserves credit.
Posted by: Alan Allport at May 12, 2005 02:07 PMThe really important point about this story as I see it is that someone tried to turn a regular neighborhood church into a politicized arena and he didn't get away with it. That's a considerable achievement and a good sign and I think it deserves credit.
I really hope you're right; I hope it was the local and not the nationwide pressure that shamed him out of the pulpit. But was this one man? What about the members of the congregation who supposedly stood up and applauded the casting-out?
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at May 12, 2005 04:44 PMThe really important point about this story as I see it is that someone tried to turn a regular neighborhood church into a politicized arena and he didn't get away with it. That's a considerable achievement and a good sign and I think it deserves credit.
Agreed, but I think Martha makes a reasonable point. It's nice to see things working out this way but it's not clear why this happened, or whether this incident is a symptom of a wider tendency that will not always be so neatly foiled. Blasting people as -- I don't know, what? elitist? -- for not, uh, giving the congregation credit seems a little presumptuous to me.
Posted by: Alan Hogue at May 16, 2005 12:13 AM