February 24, 2006

Church, charity and state

The IRS has just posted results of its investigation into complaints of improper political activity by tax-exempt religious institutions and charities during the 2004 election season. Due to quick reading I wonder if I'm missing political implications therein. Anyone want to take a closer look?

Posted by Martha Bridegam at February 24, 2006 02:24 PM
Comments

I believe that Ralph has written a bit about the "Justice Sunday" events in the past year or so.

Personally, I've only seen explicitly political messages show up twice in church services -- one anti-abortion homily immediately after some mid-nineties Supreme Court abortion decision, and one death-row moratorium petition drive set up by the church door. Your mileage may vary, obviously. A friend of mine attends this guy's church, and apparently the book's subjects are weekly sermon fodder.

Posted by: Ben Brumfield at February 24, 2006 02:52 PM

I just read the whole report, and because they're preserving the anonymity of those who were accused and dismissed, accused and warned, and accused and had exempt status revoked, it's impossible to tell whether the enforcement was in any way politically slanted. The report does note that many violations were due to misunderstanding of the rules: organizations had in some cases gone to great lengths to avoid explicitly endorsing a candidate, but had still broken the rules by implicit endorsements and were surprised when investigated.

Posted by: Ben Brumfield at February 25, 2006 09:40 PM

Hmmm, well, there's this one.

Posted by: http://home.pacbell.net/mabjo/martha.html at February 27, 2006 09:58 PM

Thanks for the link. The problem with the report is that anything like that has been concealed by the anonymizing of its suspects. We've heard the same sort of charges about a few churches that gave anti-war sermons, as well, but that's not in the report either.

Posted by: Ben Brumfield at February 28, 2006 07:13 AM