I've been reading Bernard-Henri Lévy's American Vertigo lately. It's less reminiscent of Democracy in America than it is of the more freeform notes de Tocqueville took during his travels. (Regarding which, could anyone point me to the passage where Tocqueville meets Sam Houston as he's leaving Tennessee?) One of Lévy's fascinations is with how Americans interact with history, and I thought I'd share this passage:
Posted by Ben Brumfield at March 1, 2006 07:08 AMThe give me, at the Hotel Fort Des Moines, the room that's reserved, eight days from now, for John Kerry.
I write down this detail because it's the first thing the receptionist tells me as I'm registering.
Better than that, they've taken care to display on my night table, next to a framed photo of the candidate playing the guitar, a plate of cheese wrapped in cellophane identical to the one that will be served to him on the evening of his arrival and, in another frame, a copy of the fax sent by his press secretary detailing his minibar preference: "Mixed nuts; chocolate chip cookies; diet soda (preferably Diet Coke in the can); bottled water; plain M&M's (no peanuts); regular Doritos."
The craze for the relic, this time. A taste for preservation and for the museum, taken to the n
th degree. No longer, as in Cooperstown, the artificial as opposed to the authentic. Nor is it as in Dearborn, where, the other day, I visited Henry Ford's Americana museum: everything that has existed will, one day or another, end up in a museum; even if it's under the heading "fake," we might as well make a museum of everything right away. But, even more striking, more extravagant: yes, everything is becoming a relic; a mere plate of cheese is becoming a museum piece, but the museum piece is a plate of cheese that has not been eaten yet, or even served — it's a kind of antemuseum, a prerelic, an extension into the realm of memory of what has not yet taken place.
So what do you think of the book? The views on the Amazon site seem unusually mixed. And there seems to have been quite some thrashing around on the subject in January: Garrison Keillor calling it "the classic Freaks, Fatties, Fanatics & Faux Culture Excursion beloved of European journalists for the past 50 years" and Christopher Hitchens calling Keillor a "vulgarian" (you ask me, it takes one to know one). Looks like a good ole can o' worms anyhow.
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at March 2, 2006 04:31 PMSo far I've enjoyed it. BHL is careful to differentiate his role as a French anti-anti-American from his contact with America itself, which I enjoy. After I finish it, I'll probably skim Woodward's The Old World's New World, and see where it sits within his historiography.
The book is surprisingly disjointed, however — I will say that, even though I'm not to page 100 yet.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield at March 2, 2006 06:58 PMThe book looks interesting. I wonder, though, if Keillor doesn't have a point, based on this passage. It sounds as if he's wandering around collecting oddities and making a lot of hay out of them. Do you think he's on to something in this passage, Ben?
Posted by: Alan Hogue at March 3, 2006 11:04 PMWell, he's not making as much hay as you'd think. No grand theories so far, and given the structure of the book I'll be surprised if I encounter any.
So Keillor's criticism is pretty accurate. It just so happens that I enjoy disjointed travellogues by foreigners visiting the U.Ss, however, and Levy has done a pretty good job of it.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield at March 4, 2006 03:03 PM