October 03, 2006

Nothing to lose but our aitches

I'm posting you-know-where about this as well because it's just so striking: A Guardian narrative of Social Exploration discoveries today is full of the same naive nostalgia as Jack London's story "South of the Slot." I have trouble understanding why present-day culture-crossers like this Gillian Evans don't learn from their predecessors how to get beyond the grass-is-always-greener stage of thinking about social stereotypes.

(Yes, I know Jack London himself was crossing toward the "posh" side of life, not the other direction, but he had a grass-is-always-greener problem of his own. Wanted to be both in and outside the Working Class yet couldn't accept that social categories don't really fit many individual circumstances.)

Posted by Martha Bridegam at October 3, 2006 10:14 PM
Comments

There's a lot strange about the Evans article. One of the things I find oddest is her internalization of the sort of posh-accent == pretention equation her neighbors make. This notion that how her speech is perceived equates to her own metrics for self-value on some fundamental level — beyond the worthy goals of setting other people at ease and avoiding misunderstanding — it's really a part of the whole quest for authenticity, isn't it?

Posted by: Ben Brumfield at October 4, 2006 10:51 AM

Yes, and she's keeping her snobberies intact by praising instead of disdaining all the familiar stereotypes.

...and her article is about class but she backhands race into it pretty awkwardly.

Yes, it's an odd approach. You just wonder, doesn't she know there's a whole literature on how not to do this stuff?

Posted by: Martha Bridegam at October 4, 2006 11:36 AM

Were you also surprised by this:

This is the first intimation I have that within one relatively small area of London, and within one community like Bermondsey, there are different kinds of common people.

Our author has lived for over a decade among this community, and this is the first time she's realized that its members differentiate each other based on manners, appearance, character and wealth? Perhaps it's because I come from a heirarchical culture, but I could never imagine assuming some group of different people are a perfectly level/egalitarian society free of distinction.

Posted by: Ben Brumfield at October 4, 2006 01:40 PM

Seems to me she hadn't cared to know until recently. It reads a lot like Dan Quayle's alleged comment on returning from Central America: "You'd be surprised, they're all different countries."

Posted by: Martha Bridegam at October 4, 2006 03:10 PM