I've been reading Jane Jacobs' The Death And Life of Great American Cities, and a wonderful productively cranky book it is. I hadn't otherwise heard of Welwyn Garden City except in a snide reference from Orwell in his famous diatribe about "fruit juice drinkers" etc. Now it turns out the place was one of the early models for the now-discredited U.S. (and British, I gather) approach to project housing, according to which the people would be uplifted by proximity to green grass and separation from commercial or industrial uses.
As we now know, the green grass surrounding projects, even if well maintained, becomes dangerous ground because nobody has a reason to spend much time on it, and nobody walks on the promenades among the identical project buildings because they don't lead to a workplace or a movie theater or a shoemaker or a dollar store or a place to buy a cup of coffee or a newspaper. Jacobs adds the only-obvious-when-noted insight that awful boring uniformity is the near-inevitable result of any attempt to place large numbers of people on a finite piece of land that also must have some required percentage of green space around it.
Have other folks here read this nicely entertaining book? It's tremendous. She was the dean of all the Little Old Ladies In Tennis Shoes who fought to save U.S. neighborhoods from sweeping notions of urban renewal all through the twentieth century. Like Orwell, in a way, she had the courage to turn uncredentialed crankiness into a virtue rather than a liability, and the writing skill to get away with it.
Posted by Martha Bridegam at February 4, 2007 12:16 PMLife and Death is so well-known, I think, because both sides of the planning debate believe she was one of their own.
Planners marveled at Jacobs' penetrating observations, and drew this moral: "Great cities and great neighborhoods have characteristics x, y, and z. We must incorporate these characteristics into our planning." Today, they revere her as their patron saint.
People who are skeptical of planning (like me) read the book as a long diatribe against top-down planning, not just pre-1960 planning. Cities and neighborhoods are more vibrant when they develop organically, from the bottom up. Trying to eliminate all the friction and annoyances that accompany growth just squeezes the life out of a city.
I've always wanted to read it. Maybe I'll pick it up today and we can do a reading group again.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield at February 6, 2007 04:36 AMIt's true Jane Jacobs is easy to claim. The first I heard of her was from some awful newcomer yuppies here, who with their objets d'art barely unpacked were claiming to be a "neighborhood voice" in favor of a blockbusting ritzy-condo development. They put me off reading her for years.
Posted by: Martha Bridegam at February 6, 2007 09:13 AM